Wondering if Cost Segregation is worth it for your property? Click here to see your potential tax savings in under 1 minute with our free calculator

Project Summary

When a precision agriculture company set out to build a variable-rate irrigation and soil-monitoring platform capable of adjusting water and nutrient delivery in real time across dramatically different soil compositions, crop varieties, and weather patterns, the engineering challenge was steep from day one. Sensor readings had to hold up in clay, loam, and sandy soils alike, and the control algorithms had to translate that data into precise field decisions without over- or under-applying water and nutrients. The team didn’t fully realize how much of that development work qualified under the IRS R&D tax credit until a formal study was completed. By satisfying the four-part test, the company unlocked $140,225 in federal R&D tax credits and $51,975 in state credits, amounting to $192,200 in total savings.

Project Overview

To qualify for the R&D Tax Credit, each activity must satisfy the IRS four-part test. CSSI’s analysis confirmed that the qualifying activities identified for this company met all four criteria:

  • Business Component: The company developed a proprietary precision-irrigation and soil-monitoring platform, integrating in-field sensor arrays, wireless data transmission, and variable-rate control software designed to optimize water and nutrient delivery across diverse soil and crop conditions, a direct effort to develop a new or improved business component under IRC 41.
  • Elimination of Uncertainty: At the outset, it was unknown whether sensor calibration could remain accurate across varying soil compositions and moisture levels, and whether the control algorithms could reliably convert that data into precise irrigation and fertigation adjustments without over- or under-application. The team worked systematically to resolve those uncertainties.
  • Process of Experimentation: Engineers ran multi-season field trials across different soil types and crop varieties, iteratively recalibrating sensors and simulating irrigation-scheduling algorithms against real field data, refining each prototype based on measured outcomes at each stage.
  • Technological in Nature: The work relied on agricultural engineering, soil science and agronomy, and data science and software engineering.

Employee Wages

$780,500

Supply and Contractor Costs

$388,050

Total QRE’s

$1,168,550

Total State Credit

$51,975

Total Federal Credit

$140,225

Study Results

The analysis identified a total of $1,168,550 in Qualifying Research Expenses (QREs) across the tax year. Employee wages accounted for the largest share, with $780,500 attributable to agricultural engineers, soil scientists, data scientists, and field trial technicians directly engaged in qualifying research activities. Supply costs contributed an additional $245,750 in qualifying expenses, primarily from prototype sensor components, irrigation control hardware, and soil and crop sample testing used in development and validation. Contractor expenses added $142,300, representing the 65% allowable portion of third-party research costs under IRC 41. Based on those qualifying expenses, the study produced a federal R&D Tax Credit of $140,225 and a state R&D Tax Credit of $51,975, bringing the company’s total tax credit benefit to $192,200.

Key Takeaways

  • Core agronomic R&D qualifies. The uncertainty this company faced, whether sensor and algorithm performance would hold up across variable soil and weather conditions, is exactly the type of technical uncertainty the IRS credit is designed to reward.
  • The workforce is the biggest driver. The $780,500 in qualifying wages reflects agricultural engineers, soil scientists, data scientists, and field trial technicians doing their normal technical work, work that generates credit eligibility hourly.
  • Supply and material costs compound the benefit. The $245,750 in supply costs, covering prototype sensors, irrigation hardware, and soil and crop testing, added meaningfully to the total credit.
  • Contractor costs are recoverable. The $142,300 in contractor expenses shows that outside labs and engineering consultants can contribute significant qualifying costs, a benefit many agriculture companies leave on the table.
  • Agriculture is a credit hotspot. Soil, weather, and crop biology vary constantly, so high technical uncertainty is the norm rather than the exception, making R&D credit analysis especially valuable for precision agriculture and agtech companies.

Ready to Discover Your R&D Tax Credits Potential?

If your company is developing or improving products, formulas, or processes, you may be leaving significant tax credits on the table. CSSI’s engineering-based approach ensures every qualifying activity is identified, documented, and defensible, so you capture the full value of the work your team is already doing.

Request a Free Analysis today and find out what your business could qualify for.




More Case Studies

866-757-6484